AgentRaaS vs Arcade.dev

No per-user authorization model. Genuinely open-core instead.

Arcade.dev is built for authorization and governance — an agent acting as a specific end-user, with that user's actual permissions, backed by real enterprise funding. AgentRaaS doesn't have that identity model; it's org-scoped, and its whole reason to exist is exactly-once execution. Worth knowing which gap you're actually trying to close.

Where the two actually differ

Arcade's three pillars are authorization, reliability, and governance. AgentRaaS is deliberately narrower: exactly-once execution, proven, not asserted.

DimensionAgentRaaSArcade.dev
Core jobExactly-once execution, dedup, circuit breaker, audit logAuthenticated tool-calling with per-user authorization and governance
Identity modelOrg-scoped API keysPer-end-user delegated authorization — the agent acts as a specific person
Tool catalog~22 curated + self-serve HTTP and MCP Custom Actions8000+ MCP tools
Self-hosted, freeYes, unlimited, forever, MIT/Apache-2.0 coreNo self-host free tier
Entry priceFree tier, $20/month ProFree hobby tier (100 auth challenges, 1000 tool executions/mo), $25/month next tier
FundingSolo-built, bootstrapped$72M total, $60M Series A (June 2026) — SYN Ventures, Morgan Stanley, Wipro

When Arcade is genuinely the better choice

You need per-user delegated authorization and enterprise governance

If your real requirement is "the agent should only be able to do what this specific logged-in user is allowed to do," that's an identity/authorization problem AgentRaaS doesn't solve today — Arcade was built specifically for it, and their funding reflects real enterprise demand for that governance layer. AgentRaaS's org-level API keys are a different, coarser model.

Sources: Arcade Raises $60M — Enterprise DNA, Arcade Review — The AI Agent Index

See it stop a duplicate charge in your own terminal

Get started free →